the boston globe has an interesting article about the evolution of the political soundbite as a media tool, namely, the continual reduction in its average length.
In the summer of 1992, just as George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Ross Perot were gearing up for their presidential race, CBS announced a new policy for its nightly news. Starting immediately, the network would not use any sound bite — that is, any footage of a candidate speaking uninterrupted — that lasted less than 30 seconds.
If you’ve watched any political coverage since 1992, you know what happened: CBS’s experiment failed. This week, as Congress’s 112th session begins, the shrinking sound bite stands as a rare enemy of Republicans and Democrats alike. Whether running for president of the United States or for city council, politicians can count on seeing their words broken into ever smaller and more fragmentary bits. You might debate whom to blame — asked about nine-second sound bites, one TV executive replied, “the politicians started it” — but you can’t dispute the trend. In recent presidential elections, the average TV sound bite has dropped to a tick under eight seconds. A shorter, dumber, and shriller political discourse, it seems, has become another hazard of modern life. (via)
in somewhat unrelated news... you know how john bo
ehner
cries all the time?
3 comments:
at least he is capable of crying, unlike that cold, plastic b, nancy. am i right? (you know i'm right)
nancy ran that house with the poise of a lady and the strength of three men! remember when hillary got choked up once and everyone went banana crackers?
nancy P on john boehner's crying:
"if i cry, it's about the personal loss of a friend or something like that...but... i would never think of crying about any loss of an office, because that's always a possibility, and if you're professional, then you deal with it professionally."
john boehner needs to put his "man pants" on.
Post a Comment