18 January 2010
Rest In Peace, and thanks... for everything
Glen Bell, founder of TACO BELL, has passed away. gone, but not forgotten. just like the tacos i ate yesterday.
leave your favorite order in the comments.
ykwgmg : tim teabag
Come Sunday, Feb. 7, Tebow will already be on the Super Bowl telecast. That's because Tebow and a faith group, Focus on the Family, will be debuting a 30-second commercial that utilizes Tebow's own life story to make the case that abortion is wrong. (via)ugh. ;(
time to panic!!!!
thx g!
2Pz dictionary
while in boston this weekend, a new phrase was inspired by the friendly and welcoming nature of the city's natives. new yorkers are sure to love it!bEaNbAgZ
(n.) douchebags from boston (beantown).
feel free to spread that around.
we're terrible!
everyone take note:
2Pz has converted our number one fan and arguably the number one person, dj valdini, into our new boston correspondent. everyone give him a BIG welcome. he'll be helping to deliver tales from our recent boston adventure, and to add a fresh new perspective to your daily life.
you're welcome!
2Pz has converted our number one fan and arguably the number one person, dj valdini, into our new boston correspondent. everyone give him a BIG welcome. he'll be helping to deliver tales from our recent boston adventure, and to add a fresh new perspective to your daily life.
you're welcome!
nope.
New York Times Chairman Arthur Sulzberger Jr. appears close to announcing that the paper will begin charging for access to its website, according to people familiar with internal deliberations. After a year of sometimes fraught debate inside the paper, the choice for some time has been between a Wall Street Journal-type pay wall and the metered system adopted by the Financial Times, in which readers can sample a certain number of free articles before being asked to subscribe. The Times seems to have settled on the metered system. (via)
What's for Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner: Boston edition
Y.M.N.K.T. but Kylie, G. Animals, and 2pz friend Liz came to visit me in Boston this weekend. Here is what we ate!
For Breakfast:
Everything! Pancakes, Bacon, Scrambles, Bagels with CC, Grapefruit, OJ, Milk, and a Box Of Coffee! Made in my kitchen
For Lunch:
We went to one of the oldest Pubs in Boston it's called The Green Dragon. It was supposed to be a snack but the portions were pretty huge i give it 8 biscuits. We were being meanmugged by a couple of bean bags, and our waitress wasn't fantastic but the food was pretty good.
Kylie: Chicken Quesadilla, and a Sam Adams Boston Lager (when in Rome)
G. Animals: Veggie Quesadilla, Side of Veggies (natch) and a hot toddie.
Liz: Revolutionary Buffalo Chicken, and a Magners Cider
DJV: Nachos (natcho!) and a Magners. They went a little overboard on the onions. but otherwise pretty good.
LATE NIGHT!
After hours of dancing in the clerb, we went to Hi-Fi Pizza in Central Square. always 11 Biscuits
Liz: Pepz
Kylie: Plain
G. Animals: Mushrooms (natch)
Other Dave: Pepz
It was pretty good.
For Breakfast:
Everything! Pancakes, Bacon, Scrambles, Bagels with CC, Grapefruit, OJ, Milk, and a Box Of Coffee! Made in my kitchen
For Lunch:
We went to one of the oldest Pubs in Boston it's called The Green Dragon. It was supposed to be a snack but the portions were pretty huge i give it 8 biscuits. We were being meanmugged by a couple of bean bags, and our waitress wasn't fantastic but the food was pretty good.
Kylie: Chicken Quesadilla, and a Sam Adams Boston Lager (when in Rome)
G. Animals: Veggie Quesadilla, Side of Veggies (natch) and a hot toddie.
Liz: Revolutionary Buffalo Chicken, and a Magners Cider
DJV: Nachos (natcho!) and a Magners. They went a little overboard on the onions. but otherwise pretty good.
LATE NIGHT!
After hours of dancing in the clerb, we went to Hi-Fi Pizza in Central Square. always 11 Biscuits
Liz: Pepz
Kylie: Plain
G. Animals: Mushrooms (natch)
Other Dave: Pepz
It was pretty good.
2 rivers really is excessive.
thx bun-bun!
17 January 2010
16 January 2010
to: rush limbaugh, from: roger ebert
You should be ha-whipped for the insult you have paid to the highest office of our nation.
Having followed President Obama's suggestion and donated money to the Red Cross for relief in Haiti, I was offended to hear you suggest the President might be a thief capable of stealing money intended for the earthquake victims.
Here is a transcript from your program on Thursday:
Justin of Raleigh, North Carolina: "Why does Obama say if you want to donate some money, you could go to whitehouse.gov to direct you how to do so? If I wanted to donate to the Red Cross, why do I have to go to the White House page to donate?"
Limbaugh: "Exactly. Would you trust the money's gonna go to Haiti?"
Justin: "No."
Rush: "But would you trust that your name's gonna end up on a mailing list for the Obama people to start asking you for campaign donations for him and other causes?"
Justin: "Absolutely!"
Limbaugh: "Absolutely!"
That's what was said.
Unlike you and Justin of Raleigh, I went to Obama's web site, and discovered the link there leads directly to the Red Cross. I can think of a reason why anyone might want to go via the White House. That way they can be absolutely sure they're clicking on the Red Cross and not a fake site set up to exploit the tragedy.
But let me be sure I have this right. You and Justin agree that Obama might steal money intended for the Red Cross to help the wretched of Haiti.
This conversation came 48 hours after many of us had seen pitiful sights from Port au Prince. Tens of thousands are believed still alive beneath the rubble. You twisted their suffering into an opportunity to demean the character of the President of the United States.
This cannot have been an accident. A day earlier, in a sound bite from your show, you said "this will play right into Obama's hands. He's humanitarian, compassionate. They'll use this to burnish their, shall we say, 'credibility' with the black community -- in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It's made-to-order for them."
Setting aside your riff on Harry Reid, consider what you imply. Obama will aid Haiti to please African-Americans. Haiti has lost untold thousands of lives. One third of the population has lost its homes. Countless people are still buried in the rubble. Every American president would act quickly to help our neighbor. You are so cynical and heartless as to explain Obama's action in a way that unpleasantly suggests how your mind works.
You have a sizable listening audience. You apparently know how to please them. Anybody given a $400 million contract must know what he is doing.
That's what offends me. You know exactly what you're doing.
Having followed President Obama's suggestion and donated money to the Red Cross for relief in Haiti, I was offended to hear you suggest the President might be a thief capable of stealing money intended for the earthquake victims.
Here is a transcript from your program on Thursday:
Justin of Raleigh, North Carolina: "Why does Obama say if you want to donate some money, you could go to whitehouse.gov to direct you how to do so? If I wanted to donate to the Red Cross, why do I have to go to the White House page to donate?"
Limbaugh: "Exactly. Would you trust the money's gonna go to Haiti?"
Justin: "No."
Rush: "But would you trust that your name's gonna end up on a mailing list for the Obama people to start asking you for campaign donations for him and other causes?"
Justin: "Absolutely!"
Limbaugh: "Absolutely!"
That's what was said.
Unlike you and Justin of Raleigh, I went to Obama's web site, and discovered the link there leads directly to the Red Cross. I can think of a reason why anyone might want to go via the White House. That way they can be absolutely sure they're clicking on the Red Cross and not a fake site set up to exploit the tragedy.
But let me be sure I have this right. You and Justin agree that Obama might steal money intended for the Red Cross to help the wretched of Haiti.
This conversation came 48 hours after many of us had seen pitiful sights from Port au Prince. Tens of thousands are believed still alive beneath the rubble. You twisted their suffering into an opportunity to demean the character of the President of the United States.
This cannot have been an accident. A day earlier, in a sound bite from your show, you said "this will play right into Obama's hands. He's humanitarian, compassionate. They'll use this to burnish their, shall we say, 'credibility' with the black community -- in the both light-skinned and dark-skinned black community in this country. It's made-to-order for them."
Setting aside your riff on Harry Reid, consider what you imply. Obama will aid Haiti to please African-Americans. Haiti has lost untold thousands of lives. One third of the population has lost its homes. Countless people are still buried in the rubble. Every American president would act quickly to help our neighbor. You are so cynical and heartless as to explain Obama's action in a way that unpleasantly suggests how your mind works.
You have a sizable listening audience. You apparently know how to please them. Anybody given a $400 million contract must know what he is doing.
That's what offends me. You know exactly what you're doing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)